Friday, November 1, 2019

The N00b T00b - A Quick, Easy, Scratch Built Tube Fin Rocket - Part 1: The Basic Build


I have a bunch of random model rocket parts lying around the Rocket Room. Some are things I intentionally stocked up on, and some are leftovers from kits I modified, or from other projects.

I have a bunch of short, BT-20 sized tubes (0.736 inch in diameter). They're most certainly supposed to be motor tubes, though they're a little short, so I'm not sure where they came from. Most Estes engine tubes are about the same length as an 18mm (A, B, or C) motor, while these are shorter. If you used them for a motor mount tube, you'd have to have the motor hang out the back by at least a half inch, whereas most Estes kits have the engine stick out about 1/4 to 3/8 inch.


I think they're leftover stuff from Rocket Camp which ended up in my pile of parts, and I think they might be from Pitsco, which a previous Rocket Camp teacher seems to have used.

I also had one 8.75 inch long BT-20 body tube which I know is a leftover from Rocket Camp. When you teach model rocketry to kids, there will always be parts left over. Not from the kits the kids build, but from the extra kits you have on hand.

Kids at camp will lose parts, glue parts in the wrong spot, shove parts up their noses or get them stuck firmly on their fingers and need them cut off by the nurse (yes, this all happened). Consequently, some of them won't have a rocket to complete if you don't have spare parts, and a kid at Rocket Camp with no rocket to build is likely to get bored and become disruptive. This is really a digression, but if you ever teach model rocket camp, make sure you have extra kits, and be prepared to end up with a bunch of random parts left over.

So, having given away launch lugs, engine blocks, fins, etc., I had one body tube left over from an Estes Viking.

I hadn't started building a rocket in a long time. The N00b family had recently moved, and for a while I was trying to just finish building and painting all the stuff I'd started in the previous two years. My build pile of kits is so big, I didn't know where to start.

Then I thought: maybe I should build a quick tube fin rocket, just to get back into it.

When it comes to model rockets, my tastes are pretty traditional. I like rockety-looking rockets - a nose cone, long body tube, and three or four fins. I'm not as interested in odd-rocs, saucers, boost gliders, or tube fin rockets. That's not a criticism - I enjoy seeing them fly at launches. It's just for my own fleet, I like mainly sport models and the occasional scale model.

But tube fin rockets can be fun. They have a lot of devotees. They can be simple to construct, and unlike rockets with flat fins, they apparently do not weathercock.

N00b Note: "Weathercocking" is when a rocket arcs into the wind. Almost all model rockets do this to some extent. It's a kind of side effect of fin stabilization. As a rocket's fins correct its trajectory in flight, lift on the fins rotates the rocket body around its Center of Gravity. As it oscillates, the rocket will tend to correct more in the direction the wind is coming from. Rockets with larger fins or rockets which lift off slowly tend to weathercock more severely than faster models, which may only weathercock slightly closer to apogee. See The Handbook of Model Rocketry by G. Harry Stine and Bill Stine for more on this phenomenon.

I had lots of parts, so building a tube fin model would be easy. Tube fin rockets can come in different designs, and I'm no expert on them, but it seems that the easiest to build quickly are rockets which use the same diameter tube for fins as it does for the main body tube. You can fit six tube fins perfectly around the center tube, so getting them glued on straight is easy.

As far as "designing" the tube fin rocket would go, there wouldn't be much design. I had parts, so I'd glue them together. I wasn't going to have to cut anything or shape anything. I'd just see how it turned out.


The rocket used a BT-20 body tube, the diameter used for 18mm A, B, and C motor mounts. So this would be what's called "minimum diameter." No centering rings, no engine hook, no motor mount - the body tube is the motor mount. Minimum diameter rockets tend to fly very high. Some examples beginners might know are the Estes Viking, Wizard, Hi-Flier, etc. The motor would be kept in the rocket though friction fit - a wrap of masking tape around the engine until it's tight enough that it won't fall out of the rocket, or be ejected out by the ejection charge.

Construction was simple. First, I glued in a spare engine block I found in my spare parts. I pushed it n place with an old motor casing so that the motor would hang out the back by about 1/4 inch.

Next, I glued on the fins. This is the part that makes a tube fin like this a snap. To get the fins on straight, you start with one fin. Run a thin bead of glue down one side of the tube fin and attach it to the main body tube. Then, lie both tubes on the work table, side by side.


A straightedge helped me make sure the ends of the tubes were even with one another, and the fact that both tubes were lying on a flat surface as the glue dried ensured that they were parallel - that the tube fin was straight.

As the first fin dried, I ran a bead of glue down a second tube fin and attached that to the body tube by laying it down next to the first tube fin.


A third tube fin was glued to the body tube laid on the table opposite the first fin.

I needed to figure out where to put the launch lug, since I'd never built one of these before. I tried to see if I could hide it in a gap on the body tube between two tube fins, but it turns out that BT-20 tube fins are a little too small to hold a 1/8 inch launch lug between them. So I glued a launch lug inside the fourth fin and glued that in place in the remaining gap on the body tube.








I made sure all the tube ends were even using my sanding block, and then I let the glue dry a little bit. The first four fins went on in about 10-15 minutes.


I flipped the rocket over when I felt the glue would hold without things moving, and quickly glued the remaining two fins in place in about 1 minute's time.


That was it. I popped on the nose cone, and had a look. With the exception of putting in a shock cord, the rocket was built.


Coming up: Stability? Payload? Paint? How about a name for this rocket??

Follow me on Twitter.

Like my Facebook page for blog updates and extra stuff.

Have a question you'd like to see addressed on this blog? Email me at iamtherocketn00b@gmail.com. 

Tuesday, October 29, 2019

NaRoBloMo (???)

Photo Credit: The New York Zoological Society

#Rocketober is nearly at an end, and if you were a regular reader of The Rocket N00b blog in the past, you may be wondering what gives, and why ol' N00bie here hasn't published a word on model rocketry in nearly three months.

Lotta life stuff, of course. Moving to a new home (the new Rocket Room is huge - Mrs. N00b wanted me to let you know how kind she is to let me use the largest room in the house for this weird hobby of mine), taking care of a wiggly toddler who needs lots of attention, and tech issues.

Antares :(

The old laptop died on me a few months back. All I have now is my refurbished MacBook Air I use to record The Rocketry Show podcast, which the show was able to pick up for a mere ten bucks.

It's not a bad little computer at all - and works a lot better for podcasting than my old machine. But all my pictures and video were on the old machine. While I was able to rescue the data, using it right now is kind of a hassle. And any photos or video I take with my "good" (-ish) camera has to stay on it for the time being. The camera uses an SD card, but the MacBook has no reader. There is a USB cable, but I've never been able to get the MacBook - or, for that matter, the old PC laptop - to recognize the camera when I plug it in. There was probably some software for the camera I was supposed to install which I lost a long time ago.

Since this blog is - at least supposed to be - partly a place for tutorials for model rocketry beginners - rocket n00bs - I like to have lots of good pictures on my posts to make things clear.

Anyway, I've only recently had time to get back to building rockets, and it's time I give this blog my attention again.

The N00b T00b - a recent scratch-built tube fin rocket I put together in about 15 minutes, not including paint

November is National Novel Writing Month - or NaNoWriMo for short. It's actually an international thing now, and the point is to finally sit down and write that book you've always wanted to take a crack at, by simply doing it, whether it's good or not. The goal is to finish writing 100,000 words between November 1 and 30.

Well, I've started and abandoned multiple NaNoWriMo projects over the years, and I know I'm not going to write a novel in the next month - not with a toddler to raise and rockets to build, oh and a job to pay for these things. But blog posts can be short!

So, November will be my attempt at a personal National Rocketry Blogging Month, or NaRoBloMo, if you like.

I'm going to attempt to write something hobby rocketry-related every day for the month of November. One thing that occasionally trips me up here at The Rocket N00b is my tendency to be longwinded, and try to explain everything in one post. I'm not going to be able to do that. But I want to jump-start this blog again, and hopefully beginners - and experienced rocketeers - will find something useful, or at least fun, on here.

A note for you long-timers: I know a lot of readers here are not n00bs, but I'm going to try to get back to basics here. So, before you leave a comment, know that at least some of the information here is supposed to be aimed at the newbies in the audience.

And for you Rocket N00bs reading this - I really have no idea what I'm going to write over the next month. That's the point. I'm going to try to post, post, post. You might come across something more advanced or esoteric, because I hear about a news item or think of something that interests me, but isn't about beginning model rocketry. Don't let that dissuade you from reading more. Come back - there will be plenty of photos of build techniques or... something fun or useful.

The Semroc Bandit - a kit I finished building yesterday

And, hey, if you like this idea, why not join me? If you write a rocketry blog, try a post a day in November. If you don't have a blog, start one! There's free blogging space on multiple websites, including this one (Blogger). Hastag: #NaRoBloMo.

Okay, here goes...

Follow me on Twitter.

Like my Facebook page for blog updates and extra stuff.

Have a question you'd like to see addressed on this blog? Email me at iamtherocketn00b@gmail.com. 

Thursday, July 18, 2019

Update Apollo

Just a quick note:

I haven't posted here in quite a while (though I do post on Facebook, Instagram, and sometimes Twitter, for quick stuff). There are a few reasons why - life has been busy, the N00b family are moving to a new place soon, etc. I didn't finish my Saturn V series before this weekend.

But the Model Rocket Building blog has done a really great series on the Estes Saturn V. That's how to do it right. My series was more meant to show that, even if you make mistakes, the rocket will turn out okay, so don't be afraid to go ahead and build it.

In any case, I'll get back to this blog again soon.

But I did finish my Saturn V - at least, I've finished it enough to fly it this weekend, July 20, the 50th anniversary of the Apollo 11 moon landing.



Turned out great. In this picture, it looks nearly perfect.

But, in fact, it's not, and that's why you should still build yours, even if you don't think you're a master craftsperson. A picture you see of a rocket which looks great on the Internet should not make you doubt your own skills, and shouldn't make you reluctant to build what you want to build.

I'll probably do a shortened version of that series soon, just to show the flaws up close. Not to be critical of my own work - just to show that a rocket where you make lots of "mistakes" can still be awesome.

For now, I have packing to do, and prep for this weekend's big launch.

Ad lunam.

Follow me on Twitter.

Like my Facebook page for blog updates and extra stuff.

Have a question you'd like to see addressed on this blog? Email me at iamtherocketn00b@gmail.com. 

Friday, May 17, 2019

TARC Finals Live


Saturday, May 18, the Team America Rocketry Challenge national finals take place in The Plains, Virginia.

You can watch the events live on YouTube by CLICKING HERE.


Follow me on Twitter.

Like my Facebook page for blog updates and extra stuff.

Have a question you'd like to see addressed on this blog? Email me at iamtherocketn00b@gmail.com. 

Thursday, April 4, 2019

DIY Camera Rig


My positive pressure indoor spray painting booth worked great, but it was so large, that it was impractical. Once I took it down and re-arranged the Rocket Room, I was pretty sure I'd never use it again, at least not in its original design.

Besides, I'm getting into airbrushing, which I'm hoping might take up less space than I'd need for indoor rattle can painting.

But I did need a rig for shooting downward-facing video. I have a lot of projects I'd like to add to my YouTube channel, but didn't have a decent setup to actually shoot. So I cannibalized the PVC from the paint booth to build a small, table-top camera rig which should enable me to easily shoot builds and unboxing videos.


This video isn't a how-to-build instructional. There are tons of those on YouTube. If you're interested in building one, watch a few videos and you'll get the idea of how simple it is to build one for a small camera.

My camera is held on with a 1/4-20 bolt which goes through a hole in one of the lengths of PVC. The 1/4-20 bolt (1/4 inch in diameter, 20 threads per inch) fits standard consumer camera tripod mounts.

I'm hoping to upload a lot more stuff soon. I've got some ideas I'd like to shoot!


Follow me on Twitter.

Like my Facebook page for blog updates and extra stuff.

Have a question you'd like to see addressed on this blog? Email me at iamtherocketn00b@gmail.com. 

Thursday, March 28, 2019

Lost Field


An announcement was made on Facebook last night: The Maine Missile Math & Science Club, a kind of sister club to CMASS, my NAR section, has lost its launch field, seen in the Google image above.

This is a beautiful, wide, flat open area, a large sod farm in Southern Maine. The launch area sat in the middle of a nearly circular area 3/4 of a mile across. We had a waiver from the FAA to fly high power rockets to 10,000 feet.

It was such a field.

Even for rocketeers like me, who mostly stick to low and mid power rockets, this is a real loss. Whether or not you're flying high power rockets, or going anywhere near the 10,000 foot ceiling, it's so nice to have such a large recovery area. The chances of losing a rocket over the trees is minimal. And with such a flat field, it's much easier to spot a rocket on the ground, even if it's half a mile away.


I didn't get the chance to go there at all last year, so I'm particularly sad about this. I got my Level 1 high power certification on this field. I saw Joe Barnard get his L1 on this field, and do his first demo flights of his thrust vectoring system for a NAR crowd there.

Scout takes off in its first NAR demo flight. The rock-steady flight of this finless rocket blew people's minds!

This takes me back to our chat with Steven Skinner and Ronald Dunn of Mach 1 Rocketry on The Rocketry Show. In that episode, we discussed the fact that most of the land we fly on is farmland. This land isn't our right - it's how people make their living. If the land owners decide that hosting rocketry events is no longer in their interest, they are absolutely within their rights to do so, and rocketeers would do best to respect their wishes and not complain. It can be frustrating and disappointing to lose a good field, but it was always a privilege to launch there in the first place, not a right. Land owners owe us nothing, and deserve our gratitude for letting us fly there.

The MMMSC did not do anything wrong to lose this field - the farm changed hands, and the new owners simply decided they needed to work the land 7 days per week. But it goes to show there is always a chance you may not always be able to fly at your current site. Here are a few things to consider, if you are flying on someone else's property.

A motor CATO can set a rocket on fire. Making sure you have proper safety equipment
on hand helps ensure the damage doesn't spread to the surrounding fields.

First, treat the owners and their land with absolute respect. Leave no garbage behind. Do not set fire to their field or trample crops. Have appropriate fire safety and ground maintenance equipment on hand. Make sure the land owners are treated respectfully by club members. It doesn't hurt to include farmers in the activities if they show any interest or curiosity - maybe they have children or grandchildren who would like to launch some rockets. Consider allowing friends and family of the land owner to come to a launch without charging them launch fees. While we're at it - consider giving a portion of the launch fees to the farmer as thanks for allowing you to use their fields. Launch fees won't make a farmer rich, but a token like that can go a long way.

Make it easy for a land owner to say yes, because saying no is already pretty darned easy.

Finally, if a land owner asks your club to leave, do so without complaint, and thank them for all the time they've allowed you to fly there. You may find that things change in the future, and you might one day be able to return. Burn your bridges, though, and you'll never fly there again, guaranteed. Leave your land owners on good terms!

A field can be lost for any number of reasons that have nothing to do with bad blood between clubs and land owners. A farm may change hands, through sale or inheritance, and the new owners might not be as understanding about our little hobby. They may decide to grow a different crop, and may deem rocketry - and rocketeers' feet - to be detrimental to the health of the new crop. The FAA may decide to stop issuing waivers over a particular site. Or, heck, a farm may be sold and turned into a suburban development. So it's never a bad idea to keep an eye out for potential new sites. Occasionally scouting out new prospective land is a good way to find a backup, if needed, or even a second field for the off season or special club events.

* * *

We do hope we will be able to return to the sod farm one day. I'm not involved in communicating with this land owner, so I don't know what the odds are, or what it will take. But I certainly hope we can. A field like this one is hard to replace, especially in New England. There's just not much open, flat, treeless space where land owners are willing to let strangers come and fly rockets on their property.

I do have other fields to fly on, so I'm not done, by a long shot. Our Amesbury field has a 5,000 foot waiver, and for me, that's more than plenty of altitude (for now). It's a smaller, hillier, windier field, so I've lost a lot more rockets there, but I still love it.

Our Acton field has more recovery hazards, but it's fun to fly smaller rockets there.

Our low power field in Acton is for smaller rockets, and while it's small, its' a fun space. There may be more trees and power lines, but I definitely appreciate a field where you don't have to feel inadequate not flying HPR.

For now, though, if I want to see large, M-powered rockets fly, I'll have to plan a trip further afield.

Follow me on Twitter.

Like my Facebook page for blog updates and extra stuff.

Have a question you'd like to see addressed on this blog? Email me at iamtherocketn00b@gmail.com. 

Wednesday, March 20, 2019

Built from Scratch - A Tale of Two Berthas - Part 3 (Nose Cone)


Click here for Part 1 of this series.
Click here for the most recent post in this series.

The Handbook of Model Rocketry by G. Harry Stine and Bill Stine briefly describes the process of turning a balsa wood nose cone from scratch, using a drill as a makeshift wood lathe. On page 47 of the Seventh Edition (the most recent), the authors write:

You can make your own special nose if you have an electric drill in your workshop. Drill a 1/4-inch hole in one end of a balsa block. Glue a 1/4-inch hardwood dowel into the block so that it protrudes about 1 inch. This gives you something to tighten into the chuck of the electric drill . . . When the glue dries so that the balsa block doesn't separate from the dowel as you start to spin it in the drill, insert the dowel into the chuck, turn on the drill motor, and carefully carve the balsa down to the desired nose shape using a file and very coarse sandpaper.

The Model Rocket News, Volume 7, Number 1, published by Estes Industries in December 1967, gives more explicit instructions on the process, including suggestions that you secure the drill to a work surface, draw a template to aid in shaping the nose cone the way you want it, cut away some of the excess balsa from the corners of the block, etc.


You can download a PDF that edition by clicking here.

You read these things, and if you're anything like me, you think That sounds pretty easy - but I bet it's not! Carving away just the right amount of balsa from a spinning piece with sandpaper sounds pretty simple, but I imagined it would be much harder than it sounded.

So, I went looking for a video tutorial. Surely, somebody, somewhere, had made a video on turning nose cones and uploaded it to YouTube. Probably several people, in fact.

But, try as I might, I was only able to find a short clip or two of a wooden nose cone in the middle of being turned, and on a wood lathe. The beginning of the process wasn't shown, neither was the end, and of course, the tools used were standard wood turning tools - chisels, and the like.

So, I'd have to try this just using the written instructions I had available. I thought of videotaping this process - to show how hard or easy it might be, depending on how it turned out - but I decided against it for a few reasons. First, I find when I try to videotape myself working on a rocket, even if it's something I'm pretty good at, I get a little distracted by the fact that I'm filming, and I tend to screw up. Also, since this would involve the use of a power tool, I didn't want that distraction to cause me to injure myself. Plus, it turned out that I'd have had a hard time finding a good place to put the camera and get a decent shot.

So here, in as much detail as I can give with photos and words, is how I turned this nose cone for the scratch-built Big Bertha.

A note on safety:

I am not an expert in using power tools. This post involves using a hand drill and a drill press for purposes they weren't intended for. While I never felt like I was at risk of hurting myself during this process, and I always felt like I had control over the tools I was using, I don't really know how safe or dangerous this is.

While this technique was first printed in a publication aimed mostly at children - remember, in the early days, this was largely a kids' hobby, marketed to and practiced by minors - it was also the 1960's! Things are certainly different than they once were - they used to sell chemistry sets with radioactive materials, for example, so it would seem certain standards have changed!

If you try this technique, you do so at your own risk. I cannot be responsible for you if you use a tool incorrectly or have an accident and hurt yourself. If you don't know how to use a drill or drill press safely, read the instructions, find a tutorial, or ask a friend who knows how. Consider joining a local makerspace if you need access to tools or help operating them safely. If you are a kid reading this, please don't do this without adult supervision!

Decide on the Shape and Create a Template


The first step is to decide what shape you want your nose cone to be, and to create a paper template you will use as a guide. Since I was building a Big Bertha, I didn't have to decide much, except for how long I wanted the nose cone to be. The Bertha cone is elliptical in shape, and I'd decided on 2.6 inches for the length (click here to see the previous post in this series, where I talk about questions of historical accuracy).

I don't have skills drawing or drafting, so I'd have to rely on rocket design software to do the work for me here. Luckily, when you create a design or simulation in OpenRocket, free model rocket design and simulation software, it will automatically generate a 2 dimensional template which you can print out in PDF form.


Shapes are rather limited when you use OpenRocket to create a nose cone template. If, for example, you were designing a rocket with an ogive nose cone, the template would end in a sharp point. This is partly because the mathematics used by rocket simulators to find the Center of Pressure (CP) in a model rocket make the simplifying assumption that nose cones come to a sharp point, even though in reality, most ogive nose cones are spherically blunted, meaning that the tip is rounded. That doesn't mean that you could't have a simulator which would enable you to create templates of different shapes, but which would make the same mathematical assumptions. OpenRocket could allow for spherically blunted shapes, I'm sure. And perhaps the developers will one day incorporate that feature into its design, but as of now that hasn't happened.

Still, with an elliptical cone, you don't encounter this problem. You still have a small range of shapes, but you can get a good looking Bertha cone just using OpenRocket's built-in template feature.

Next, cut out your template, as carefully as you can. You'll use this as a physical guide to check your work while turning the nose cone.


You can see that my cuts aren't perfect, as that's pretty tricky to do with either scissors or a hobby knife. But it's close enough for me to use.

Next, I traced the positive cutout from the template onto the balsa block.


This showed me what roughly what the finished 3-dimensional nose cone would look like. It didn't help that much, as the pencil marks would quickly be removed once I began turning. But it does help you visualize the cone and see how much excess you can cut off with a knife before you begin working.


Find the Center of the Balsa Block


You're going to drill down the center of the end of the balsa block and glue in a wooden dowel, to act as a spindle for the piece you're turning. It's best to find the center. I simply connected the corners with a pencil line drawn with a ruler, and that was good enough.

Even if you're slightly off, you'll be OK. Once you cut away the excess and start turning the nose cone, the dowel will end up becoming the exact center of the piece, because that's where the block will be rotating from. Still, try to get as close to the center as you can, or the block may wobble badly as you begin turning.

Choose dowel and drill bit to use. I picked a nice, thick dowel piece I found in my pile of odds and ends. It's probably best to pick the thickest dowel you can, as it will be sturdier when you turn the nose cone. At least a 1/4 inch thick is recommended.

I forget how thick this dowel was, but it was one of the thickest ones I had on hand which would fit into my drill chuck. I picked a drill bit the same diameter.


Drill into the center of the end of the balsa block. For this, I used my drill press. Drill to a good depth. On larger nose cones, you should drill deeper. I drilled till my press could go no further, and wished I could have drilled a little deeper into the balsa.


Try to drill straight down from the top. If you don't have a drill press, again, it will still be OK if you are slightly off. Once you begin turning, the dowel will become the exact center of the piece. But it's best not to start off with a wobbly, off-center block.

Glue In the Dowel Spindle


Glue the dowel into place, as deep as it will go. I would definitely use a carpenter's yellow wood glue for this. Pour some into the hole, press the dowel firmly into place, and let it dry a full 24 hours before proceeding to the next step.

Cut Away the Excess Balsa


If the block is too long, trim it down to just a bit beyond the tracing. Then, with a knife, trim away the corners a bit, so you have less to remove while turning the piece.

Put the block in the drill you're planning on using, tighten the chuck firmly, and give it a test spin.


Now, you're ready to shape the nose cone!

Turning and Shaping

I don't have any photos from the beginning of the process here, when I was starting to take material off the corners of the block. Since I started right in without making a video, I just forged ahead without stopping to take pictures every few minutes. But I can tell you that it was slow going at first.

I didn't have my hand drill secured to a base. I just held it in my left hand, and held the sanding block in my right. My sanding block was my only a shaping tool, and the coarsest sand paper I had on there was 150 grit - not terribly coarse. The beginning of the process was a lot of shaking as the sanding block bounced off of rough-hewn corners without taking much material off with each pass. I would have done better to have a much coarser sandpaper on the block - or better, to have started out with a rasp file or something similar, to shave away lots of material at the beginning, until I got a cylindrical block of wood.

And I soon realized that my hand drill was not up to the task. The chuck kept coming loose, making the piece wobble as it turned, and nearly fall out.

It seemed dangerous, and not very effective, so I switched to my drill press, which I could tighten down nice and hard. The balsa block stayed nice and steady.

Eventually, I got a nice cylinder, and then began to round the end.


After more narrowing and shaping, the block got closer to the diameter I wanted, and the tip got more rounded.


Once the block got close to the diameter of a BT-60, about 1.637 inches, I started forming the shoulder that would fit inside the rocket body tube. Since I was really into this project, I neglected to take a photo, but I started by measuring where I wanted the shoulder to start and touched a pencil to that spot as I turned the block. This left a nice black line as a reference point.

Then, I did as the old Estes instructions suggested, and used an emery board to form the shoulder. It's got a coarse side and straight edges, but its flexibility help ensure you don't sand too much off too quickly.


As the shoulder gets closer and closer to the final diameter, it's important to constantly measure and check your progress. If you make it too narrow, it might be too loose in the rocket. If it ends up a little bit loose, you can always wrap a bit of masking tape around it, but don't go too far!


Cut a ring of scrap body tube to check for the final shoulder diameter. Take the nose cone out of the chuck and try to put the body tube scrap on it, and when it just fits, slip it onto the shoulder of the nose cone and leave it there. This scrap will be your reference for the base diameter of the nose cone itself. You'll sand until the body tube and the base of the nose cone are the same.



After much work, the nose cone got closer and closer to the final shape. Here, it started looking pretty good. The base diameter was just where I wanted it, and I started working on shaping and shortening the rest of the cone.


I damaged the template and ended up cutting it in just over half. This might be easier to use anyway, rather than the full elliptical template.

Here, it's just a bit too long for the shape I wanted. It might, actually, be pretty close to the original Bertha nose cone, which, as we've mentioned before, was about 3.1 inches long. I could have stopped here, but I decided I wanted to finish this process.


Finally, I decided I was done. The cone was nicely shaped and the right length of 2.6 inches long.


I compared my work against the positive cutout from the template. Since the template is flat against the cutting mat in this photo, it looks smaller, but the nose cone and template are in fact, the same size. I couldn't believe it, but my first hand-turned nose cone came out nearly perfect.


Here's the balsa cone next to a re-claimed plastic Bertha kit nose cone, which will come up in this series in a later post.


The handmade cone is slightly longer - 2.6 inches vs. the 2.5 inch plastic cone. Still, they look... well, almost identical. I was really pleased how this turned out.

So, it turns out this is doable, even if you've never done it before. It makes a lot of dust. Some shapes might be harder to get just right than others. The key is to go slowly and don't try to work too fast.

Oh, and be careful.

Follow me on Twitter.

Like my Facebook page for blog updates and extra stuff.

Have a question you'd like to see addressed on this blog? Email me at iamtherocketn00b@gmail.com.